Montclair ballfield and the Hayward fault

This is the view from atop the old railroad crossing at Mountain Boulevard, overlooking the south end of Montclair Playground.

montclairfield

The Hayward fault is mapped running through here from about third base on the ballfield at the left across the field of view. Two trenches were dug across the fault right here in 1981, and Jim Lienkaemper, the US Geological Survey’s (therefore the world’s) leading expert on active faults in Northern California, found evidence that the 1868 earthquake ruptured the fault here. Here’s part of the map he published in 1992 showing this area (at the REN in WARREN).

HFmontclair

The map is oriented so the fault runs vertically. The codes refer to evidence of active creep (C2) and vaguer evidence of creep (C3), geomorphic features of greater and lesser distinctness (G2, G3), and the trenches (T) I mentioned. “H2″ means there was good evidence of fault motion in the last 12,000 years—in this case, historic motion. The little oval at the WA in WARREN is a sag basin, now a water feature in the park. From top to bottom, the two-letter codes are as follows: gi, gradual inflection in slope; rw, right-offset wall; sl, linear scarp; jo, opened joints or cracks in concrete; sc, scissor point (where the up and down sides switch); rb, racking/distortion of building; as, arcuate scarp; dr, depression in a right stepover (sag basin); rc, right-offset curb; so, surveyed offset feature. The other codes refer to specific publications. This level of detail is available for the entire length of the fault, and while the USGS considers its online database of 2008 to be the most current, I like the format of this older map, Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-2196

About these ads

4 Responses to “Montclair ballfield and the Hayward fault”

  1. Kevin Says:

    Is that Highway 13 running through the middle of the map?

  2. Andrew Says:

    Yes, the Warren Freeway.

  3. Oakland Daily Photo Says:

    Thanks for translating the map for us. Do you think the evidence clearly demonstrates the rupture of the 1868 quake? Wasn’t that the one that knocked a locomotive off its tracks?

  4. Andrew Says:

    Jim Lienkaemper said so and I believe him. As for the locomotive story, I have no idea but wouldn’t be surprised.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,040 other followers

%d bloggers like this: