The trout ladder

rainbow trout

The original rainbow trout come from Oakland; did you know that? The species Salmo iridia was first described, in 1855, from San Leandro Creek. Redwood Creek is a branch of San Leandro Creek that still contains good spawning grounds for rainbow trout, and this nicely maintained fish ladder is here to help them upstream.

The rainbow trout has been spread all over the world, of course. This wasn’t the only locality in the Coast Ranges they came from. The Oakland fish aren’t superior to other local strains. Their only distinction is artificial: they’re merely the first to come to scientific attention. Naturalists name species simply by picking an individual and describing it in detail in the literature. It’s arbitrary, but the only way to begin.

That’s as arbitrary as the creationist’s crude notion that the species is simply something uttered by God and named by Adam. Creationists don’t care to ask why populations vary in their genetic makeup—or if they do they regard it as the necessary decay from perfection of all earthly things. Variation is useless in their theory. But to naturalists, the reality of the species includes precisely the variation that the creationist downplays. Variation is the first rung in the ladder of evidence showing how the tree of life fits together as the result of evolution. The creationist’s interest in that project is only to suppress it.

Today we lump Salmo iridia as a subspecies under the larger species Oncorhynchus mykiss. Maybe God isn’t clear, or maybe our ideas need work. Maybe both statements mean the same thing.

About these ads

6 Responses to “The trout ladder”

  1. Roland De Wolk Says:

    where is that trout ladder? [Redwood Park — Andrew]

  2. Gwyneth Knolls Says:

    While I agree with your opinion of Creationist theory, I don’t think this is the proper forum for it. It’s supposed to be about the fish ladder and Oakland geology.

  3. Callan Bentley Says:

    Gwyneth,
    As author, isn’t Andrew the best person to determine the content of his own blog?

  4. Andrew Says:

    Gwyneth’s view is common, and I don’t mind her expressing it. Oakland is a nice place; why should it be a battleground for these clashing ideas? Our rocks and landforms are interesting; why should they be freighted with these larger meanings? But when I contemplated the fish ladder, the idea of pure species and true “kinds” was irresistible. Even in good old Oakland, creationists and scientists see our local attractions differently.

  5. Gwyneth Knolls Says:

    Andrew,
    I am sorry to say that I didn’t realize this was your personal column. I was just looking for information on the fish ladder and ran across your page. Of course you have a right to say whatever you want on your post and I was wrong to assume such a superior attitude. I do agree with everything you said, and I love visiting the fish ladder, although I understand it won’t be around much longer. I wish I could have seen it with fish in it just once.

  6. Andrew Says:

    Uh-oh: there are plans to take it out? (Apology accepted)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,854 other followers

%d bloggers like this: