<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oaklandgeology.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/scars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oaklandgeology.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/scars/</link>
	<description>focused on, near and under Oakland, California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:59:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan L</title>
		<link>http://oaklandgeology.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/scars/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oaklandgeology.wordpress.com/?p=353#comment-525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you are talking about &lt;a href=&quot;http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;source=s_q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=oakland+ca&amp;sll=37.0625,-95.677068&amp;sspn=50.37814,61.259766&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=37.850188,-122.21818&amp;spn=0.006184,0.007478&amp;t=h&amp;z=17&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; location.  It&#039;s a south-facing slope, and what grazers remain are relatively few in numbers compared to what &quot;used&quot; to run wild on those slopes. Eucalyptus will continue to dominate,
unless it is attached by geophiles bearing glyphosate :-)

The &quot;wedge&quot; you talk about appears to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://maps.google.com/maps?q=elverton+drive,+oakland,+ca&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;split=0&amp;ll=37.8504,-122.205015&amp;spn=0.007794,0.013089&amp;t=h&amp;z=17&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, showing an Oak grassland.

Without more grazers, I suspect that the wedge will get brushy over
the coming years, with coyote bush making up most of it. I don&#039;t think it can be maintained in its current state without significant human effort
(which is fine, as it is in an urban area).

I very much enjoy your writing, combining as it does walking and geology.

&lt;b&gt;[Thanks. I mis-edited this post and wiped out your first link, but now it definitely points to the location of this photo. --Andrew]&lt;/b&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are talking about <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;source=s_q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=oakland+ca&amp;sll=37.0625,-95.677068&amp;sspn=50.37814,61.259766&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=37.850188,-122.21818&amp;spn=0.006184,0.007478&amp;t=h&amp;z=17" rel="nofollow">this</a> location.  It&#8217;s a south-facing slope, and what grazers remain are relatively few in numbers compared to what &#8220;used&#8221; to run wild on those slopes. Eucalyptus will continue to dominate,<br />
unless it is attached by geophiles bearing glyphosate :-)</p>
<p>The &#8220;wedge&#8221; you talk about appears to be <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=elverton+drive,+oakland,+ca&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;split=0&amp;ll=37.8504,-122.205015&amp;spn=0.007794,0.013089&amp;t=h&amp;z=17" rel="nofollow">here</a>, showing an Oak grassland.</p>
<p>Without more grazers, I suspect that the wedge will get brushy over<br />
the coming years, with coyote bush making up most of it. I don&#8217;t think it can be maintained in its current state without significant human effort<br />
(which is fine, as it is in an urban area).</p>
<p>I very much enjoy your writing, combining as it does walking and geology.</p>
<p><b>[Thanks. I mis-edited this post and wiped out your first link, but now it definitely points to the location of this photo. --Andrew]</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
