Points south, north and meta

hayward fault

The Hayward fault is not hard to see if you have practice seeing it and if you have a good map that you’ve studied well. But even so, in Oakland there are not many spots like this, where the evidence is unmistakable. This set of echelon cracks is in the Sheffield Village neighborhood on Revere Avenue, just above its intersection with Marlow Drive. Where my previous post showed Oakland’s northernmost point on the fault, this is the southernmost spot in Oakland where the fault is clear. A little farther along is Chabot Park, a corner of Oakland so remote that you have to get the triple-A map of San Leandro to see it and drive through San Leandro to reach it. But there the fault is apparent only as a break in slope.

Anyway, Oakland is as plain as a textbook compared to Berkeley. There the fault runs through rugged land covered with rocks, woods and homes. Near the University its location is well known and evidence is good, but to the north it wanders a bit and has vaguer signs. Keep that in mind when you visit the Walking the Fault blog, an occasional project by Berkeleyan Andy Datlen. Relying on the new USGS “helicopter tour”, he is quick to identify specific homes and other features as straddling the fault or otherwise direly threatened. I don’t blame him. I think that any citizen using the USGS tool is likely to reach the same conclusions. But I don’t, and I don’t point out specific homes as threatened, for several reasons.

First, I take a scientist’s more cautious approach to the maps. The red line is an inference, a hypothesis except in the specific points where trenches, measured offsets and cracks point precisely to a fault. I use the 1992 paper version of the online map, on which every piece of evidence is given specific degrees of certainty and quality. Scientists are in love with uncertainty as well as precision; where evidence presents a blurred picture they avoid oversharpening their vision, and so do I.

Second, the fault is not obliged to rupture exactly where it did the last time. Yes, deep underground it is safe to say that the fault is a clean surface, but our best evidence is that strike-slip faults like the Hayward are a tangle of cracks, a skein of fractures. If you were to cut across the fault and pull the cut apart to see a cross section, those fractures would gradually coalesce at depth. Looked at the other way, the deep fault flowers upward from a single crack into a fan of them, among which only one or two is currently active. This “flower structure” is seen commonly in geophysical studies of the San Andreas system, of which the Hayward fault is a part.

Third, whether someone’s home is in danger is not my place to say. Only a licensed professional geologist or geotechnical engineer can determine that responsibly.

Fourth, I hold that people should expect a degree of privacy, and identifying their homes on a website is not something I want to do.

About these ads

4 Responses to “Points south, north and meta”

  1. Sue Says:

    Have you looked into the geology of the Oakland Army Base? The city seems about to give out contracts to build there. Any thoughts on building on landfill? How much danger to this area, when an earthquake will happen on the Hayward fault? What type of buildings will survive on landfill after an earthquake?

    I found your website from abetteroakland.com. That blog is now discussing the army base proposals. Plus she has links to the 4 proposals being considered.

  2. Andrew Says:

    Sue, I posted a comment over there just now.

  3. Sue Says:

    Thank you. I think it will give the builders and citizens something to think about. I am most intrigued by your statement:

    “Beyond green buildings, we need sustainable, durable sanctuary buildings in Oakland, because the 1989 earthquake was just a jiggle compared to what the Hayward fault did in 1868 and will do again.”

    Have you ever requested a list of these buildings from the from the city? Or is the city even thinking of building this into their plans for development? Do you have some thoughts on what buildings might be around after an earthquake? Schools?

  4. Andrew Says:

    I have little idea what the city plans are, but I know the government is well aware of the situation. The state emergency coordinator was hired away from Oakland a few years ago, so good groundwork has been laid here. But even assuming the best, it will take decades of sustained, concerted effort to upgrade the city into a fair state of readiness.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,040 other followers

%d bloggers like this: